Verification matrix
Claim-to-source verification matrix
This page is a starting register for matching public statements to primary evidence. It is intentionally conservative: missing fields require manual verification rather than guessed dates, issuers or legal meaning.
| Public statement | Primary evidence | What the source establishes | Status | Precise wording |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W.P.(Crl.) No. 163/2026 is part of the public court-related record cited by the archive. | Redacted petition PDF | The document records a petition/submission. It does not by itself prove every underlying allegation. | Procedural court record / documented allegation | Use procedural wording unless citing an express court finding. |
| DISHA is presented as an evidence-first intelligence architecture. | DISHA whitepaper | The whitepaper presents the architecture and claimed method. | DISHA assessment | Attribute analytical conclusions to the DISHA assessment unless independently confirmed by an authority. |
| Case 12 argues that the SIR process was unconstitutional. | Case 12 source and analysis record | The case page separates the author's argued conclusion, cited legal material, record chronology and unresolved questions. | Research analysis / argued conclusion | Attribute the conclusion to the author and distinguish it from an adjudicated court finding. |
| Some case records rely on redacted PDFs and supporting public-source material. | Evidence inventory | The inventory lists discovered public evidence files and manual verification needs. | Unresolved / manual verification required | Do not infer issuer, date or legal meaning until verified from the document. |